The Hobbit Steps Into a PR Crisis


Director Peter Jackson

Less than four weeks away from the release date of the highly anticipated Peter Jackson film The Hobbit, producers of the movie may soon be running afoul of animal rights groups. 

Animal wranglers involved in the making of The Hobbit say the production company, owned by Warner Bros., is responsible for the deaths of up to 27 animals, largely because they were kept at a farm filled with bluffs, sinkholes and other "death traps," reported the Associated Press on Nov. 19.

Though some of the deaths did come from natural causes, one wrangler told the AP that over time he buried three horses, as well as about six goats, six sheep and a dozen chickens.

A spokesman for Jackson said the deaths of two horses were avoidable, and that the production company moved quickly to improve conditions after they died. Clearly, however, those improvements weren't enough. Wranglers said they repeatedly raised concerns about the farm with their superiors and the production company, yet it continued to be used. They say they want their story aired publicly now to prevent similar deaths in the future.

It will be up to Warner Bros. and Jackson to communicate how similar animal deaths can and will be avoided on future projects, and publicly state that this is a learning experience for the entire movie industry. While Jackson's spokesman said he didn’t know if animals will be needed for future filming in the trilogy, he did add that Jackson himself adopted three of the pigs used.

Perhaps that side story, along with a new strategy to handle shortcomings in the movie industry's animal oversight system (which monitors film sets but not the facilities where the animals are housed and trained, according to the AP) and other efforts to raise awareness for the humane treatment of animals will be integrated (quickly) into Warner Bros.' massive marketing & PR machine.

Follow Bill Miltenberg: @bmiltenberg

 




1 Comment

Deals of the Week

$150 off our Content Marketing Boot Camp June 18 in NYC

Now is the time for in-house communications professionals and PR agencies to expand their roles in the content landscape.

Use code “150DEAL” at checkout.

Get $50 off our Crisis Management Guidebook

Digital PR Guidebook Vol. 5

This latest edition of PR News' Digital PR Guidebook is packed with how-to articles, first-hand insights and proven digital tactics that will take your communications initiatives to the next level.

Use code “DBKDEAL” at checkout.

Save $100 on a PR News Subscription

Let PR News become your weekly, go-to resource for the latest PR trends, case studies and tip sheets. Topics covered include visual storytelling, social media, measurement, crisis management and media relations.

Use code “SUBDEAL” at checkout.

 

  • Sue Milne

    What a shame you rushed to report on this so called ‘crisis’ without bothering to check the facts or hear the other side of the story. If you had, you would have found that these allegations have been refuted not only by the vet, other animal wranglers working on the movie, the farm managers and New Zealand’s own SPCA Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals) The latter organization received an anonymous letter this month and have investigated and found no evidence to substantiate the claims made. In an article in today’s New Zealand Herald, the head of the SPCA quite rightly questioned why, if these incidents took place as alleged between January and August 2011, the letter writer waited until this month – just before the launch of the movie – to make their allegations. Being able to differentiate between a beat up, an issue and a crisis is fundamental for PR professionals. This is a beat up.