‘Transparency Report’ Helps Google Erase Evil Image


The media is abuzz about the findings of Google's "transparency report," released to the public on Sunday, June 17. And transparent it is. The biannual document reports on three main areas: real-time and historical traffic to Google services around the world; numbers of removal requests Google receives from copyright owners or governments; numbers of user data requests Google receives from government agencies and courts.

By far the biggest media draw to the data within the report is the number of removal requests Google receives from copyright owners or governments, including the U.S. government. In fact, across the board, requests to remove content are up worldwide. "It's alarming not only because free expression is at risk, but because some of these requests come from countries you might not suspect—Western democracies not typically associated with censorship," Dorothy Chou, a senior policy analyst at Google, wrote in a blog post on Sunday.

What's interesting from a communications point of view is not so much the content of the report, but Google's concept and strategy around the report. Until March 2010, Google had been roundly criticized for adhering to China's Internet censorship policies (termed "The Great Firewall of China), possibly assisting the Chinese government in repressing its own citizens and putting some Chinese government dissidents in danger.

This perception clearly clashed with Google's "Do No Evil" message. Then, in January 2010, Google announced that it was no longer censoring results on Google.cn after the company's servers were hacked in an apparent attempt to get information on Chinese dissidents. But the damage to Google's reputation was done.

The "transparency report," which debuted in 2010, lays out attempts at censorship not only in China but from countries around the world. From the looks of initial media coverage about the report, Google is being applauded for revealing a disturbing trend that might have dangerous global repercussions. Even the biggest cynics have to admit that the report is a solid strategic response to those critical of Google's past handling of censorship issues. It puts the problem squarely on the shoulders of world governments—and not on Google, for a change.

Follow Scott Van Camp:

Comments Off


About Scott Van Camp

Scott Van Camp is editor of PR News, an executive-level, reader-supported publication that helps enhance the business impact of PR. Scott has a rich background in both journalism and PR/marketing. He has more than 15 years of experience as a writer/editor at various consumer and trade publications. Scott was with VNU Business Publications for five years, including stints as managing editor at IQ News and Technology Marketing magazines and senior editor at Brandweek. In the PR/marketing sphere, he has served as corporate communications manager at MarketBridge, a marketing and sales consultancy, and as editorial director for the Chief Marketing Officer (CMO) Council. While at the Council, Scott led several high-profile marketing research projects. He has also operated his own communications and media consulting firm, SVC Communications.

Deals of the Week

Get $150 Off PR News' PR Measurement Conference


Join us on April 20, 2015, for PR News’ essential PR Measurement Conference at the National Press Club in D.C., and learn how tie PR metrics to measurable business outcomes.

Use code “150off” at checkout to save $150 on the regular rate.

Get $50 off PR News' Book of Employee Communications


In this 5th volume of PR News’ Book of Employee Communications, our authors cover more than 45 articles on crisis communications, social media policies, human resources collaboration, brand evangelism and more.

Use code “50off” at checkout.

Save $100 on a PR News Subscription


Let PR News become your weekly, go-to resource for the latest PR trends, case studies and tip sheets. Topics covered include visual storytelling, social media, measurement, crisis management and media relations.

Use code “SUBDEAL” at checkout.

Comments are closed.