In Defense of AVEs


I read with interest PR News' April 1 article titled "Study Shows PR Pros Making Progress in Following the Barcelona Principles." I respectfully disagree with the premise that AVEs (advertising equivalencies) are not a value indicator for public relations earned media measurement.

I have used AVEs and other measures successfully throughout my 40-plus year career, which included working for multiple globally recognized, industry-leading brands and PR agencies. At each venture, AVEs were not just requested by C-level executives, they were expected.

You see, AVEs reveal something many PR professionals claim to provide—tangible value. While some may claim AVEs are inaccurate or antiquated measurements, if you review most PR award submissions, you’ll see AVEs and similar dollar-value measurements listed as key proof points for success.

The real issue related to AVEs surrounds how they’re used and derived. I believe AVEs are relevant and meaningful when combined with the following assessments and stipulations:

  • Placement is in the right medium and media

  • The placement reaches the targeted audience

  • The distribution of the placement is significant

  • The percentage of positive versus negative tone and content relating to the client

  • Client message(s) and spokesperson quotes are included in the story

  • Good story placement location and/or timing of the article or broadcast

  • Share of voice—audience impressions

  • I define AVE as cost to buy the same space or time, divided by two.

The non-measureable but significant part of AVEs is that the placement has the aura of third party credibility by originating from independent journalists or producers. It’s from here that unspoken value is derived, which only further strengthens a PR professional’s case for relevancy.

Terry Hemeyer has served on boards of directors and been in charge of communications for two major corporations. He now teaches PR Strategies at the University of Texas at Austin, crisis management in the Rice University MBA program and serves as executive counsel to Pierpont Communications.




3 Comments

avatar

About Terry Hemeyer

PR News - Access Intelligence, LLC; 88 Pine Street - 5th Floor; New York, NY 10005; 212-621-4613



Deals of the Week

Get $150 Off PR News' PR Measurement Conference

 prnews-measurement-conf-175x135-static

Join us on November 20, 2014, for PR News’ essential PR Measurement Conference, taking place at the Hyatt Regency Chicago. Commit now to grounding all of your PR efforts in metrics that connect to organizational goals and prove value that communications makes in thriving b2c and b2b companies, nonprofits and professional associations.

Use code “150off” at checkout.

Get $50 off PR News' Media Relations Guidebook


book-mediarelations-180x150

This 8-chapter resource contains practical implications for some of the most innovative developments in media relations, including the technologies, methodologies and mannerisms that determine the ecosystem in which PR pros practice this essential part of their craft.

Use code “50off” at checkout.

Save $100 on a PR News Subscription



Let PR News become your weekly, go-to resource for the latest PR trends, case studies and tip sheets. Topics covered include visual storytelling, social media, measurement, crisis management and media relations.

Use code “SUBDEAL” at checkout.

  • http://twitter.com/dmrosen9 David Rosen

    AVEs ain’t perfect. but they’re the best measurement tool we have to demonstrate the value of earned media coverage that is targeted, positive and well placed. The value of third party credibility, while not quantifiable, seems self-evident, to me at least and also to savvy employers and clients, especially when original coverage is re-purposed and cited by others.

  • VA PR Director

    I’m so glad to read this – I’ve been saying the same thing. Top execs expect to see a return on their investment, no matter what field/industry it pertains to. The Barcelona Principles ignores this and attempts to put vague “measurements” in place, which are not measurements in any shape or form. At the end of the day, a CEO or CFO wants to know what value ($y) they received for their expenditure ($x).

  • Markham Howe

    Sorry, Terry, but that AVE boat won’t float. I compliment you on trying to fix the holes with definitions and formulas, but even some of those are vague and left to interpolation. Most of all, the values you propose aren’t recognized by another outside authority. I think we all know that there is value in stories being picked up by the media, and we desperately want something to prove to our clients. However, we would never use AVE in validating negative stories. Think about Carnival Cruise Lines. Would you use AVE in measuring that mess? While their boat was still floating when they pulled it into the pier, for all practical purposes their reputation sunk faster than a rock. My experience is that some meter has to move in order to validate success; either the sales meter or the public opinion/customer satisfaction meter. There are likely other success metrics we can use, but I honestly can’t see AVE being one of them.