I’m of the stern belief that the language we use to discuss our corporate communication programs shapes the way we understand what we do as professionals, the way we measure success and, ultimately, the effectiveness of engaging with the audiences we seek to reach. All marketing disciplines have a bad habit of incorporating buzzwords without thinking them through. What’s worse, we have a knack for taking beneficial words and diluting their meaning. For instance, “community” and “authenticity” are too often used for initiatives that provide very little of either. And I increasingly see the term “listening” being bent in the same discouraging ways.
For Best Brand-Building Results, Listen Up!
You might also be interested in:
- 6 Tips to Help Build Execs' Credibility Through Bylined Articles
- Retailers' Social Actions on Instagram Up 48% Compared to Last Year
- Analytics, SEO, Virtual Teams, Video Surged in 2015, Will Continue in 2016
- A 6-Step Pre-Holidays PR Checkup to Bring the Year to a Successful Close
- 7 Tech Trends Chief Communications Officers Should Track in 2016