As the number of measurement services providers continues to grow exponentially, one of the main points of differentiation is determining who controls the tone of coverage: a human or a machine. “The biggest difference is that machines take longer to program,” says Katie Paine, CEO of KDPaine & Partners. “Also, the problem with computer coding is that [computers] don’t think like customers; they think like pseudo-humans.” In the case of the United Service Organizations ’ (USO) measurement initiative, Mark Phillips, USO’s VP of communications, says deciding between human and computer coders was essential. “Although some organizations currently offer automated coding, we decided to have human readers assess each print article or broadcast story,” he says.
DETERMINING TONE: MAN V. MACHINE
You might also be interested in:
- Case Study: Kroger Tackles Sustainability One Lonely Orange at a Time
- Northwestern Mutual Goes to Bat for Childhood Cancer
- Case Study: Klick Health Program Rewards Employees Doing Well By Enabling Them To Donate To Charity of Their Choice
- Case Study: Nikon 1 Uses Celebrities and Consumers in a Facebook Photo-Sharing Campaign Designed to Expand its Market
- Case Study: Academy of Country Music Generates New Engagement For its Awards With Multifaceted Twitter PR Campaign