Peruse the headlines of any leading newspaper, and you are guaranteed to find ample evidence that we live in an increasingly litigious world. For example: Hewlett-Packard executives are in the midst of a congressional hearing over a corporate spying probe, which even prompted the company's general counsel, Ann Baskins, to resign. Enron's C-suite members were in the legal hot seat for years after the corporation's scandalous demise, and prison terms were passed out like candy. The list of corporate malfeasance ending in the courtroom goes on and on, and it inherently poses a series of questions both for communications practitioners and corporate executives. When making a case for legal PR, where should the communications function be located to be most effective?
Legal Communications: The Verdict On In-House V. Agency PR
You might also be interested in:
- The Week in PR, July 27 - August 3
- PR News/Nasdaq Survey: Nearly One-Fifth of Communicators Shun Measurement Entirely
- Where Does PR Stand on Paid Social Media? Survey Shows Ambivalence About Spending
- Social Media Engagement on Video Posts Soars 163 Percent in 2015
- 10 Tips for Faster, More Effective Internal Crisis Communications When Time Is of the Essence