<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PR News Blog</title>
	<link>http://www.prnewsonline.com/prnewsblog</link>
	<description>PR News Online</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 16:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Feeding an Ailing Economy</title>
		<link>http://www.prnewsonline.com/prnewsblog/index.php/2008/05/13/feeding-an-ailing-economy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.prnewsonline.com/prnewsblog/index.php/2008/05/13/feeding-an-ailing-economy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 16:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cbarnes</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Domino's]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[stimulus plan]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Wal-Mart]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prnewsonline.com/prnewsblog/index.php/2008/05/13/feeding-an-ailing-economy/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This past Saturday, the New York Times ran an article about how some retailers, such as Supervalu and Domino&#8217;s Pizza are launching aggressive campaigns targeting consumers who are about to receive their federal stimulus rebate checks (individuals are getting $600 on the average while, couples are getting $1,200). What is making some raise their brows [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This past Saturday, the New York Times ran an <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/10/business/10rebate.html?_r=1&amp;scp=1&amp;sq=stimulus%20rebates&amp;st=cse&amp;oref=slogin">article</a> about how some retailers, such as Supervalu and Domino&#8217;s Pizza are launching aggressive campaigns targeting consumers who are about to receive their federal stimulus rebate checks (individuals are getting $600 on the average while, couples are getting $1,200). What is making some raise their brows is that retailers are offering special 10% bonus gift cards and other special inducements provided that consumers spend their entire windfall on their products.</p>
<p>Yet not all retailers are falling in line. Wal-Mart, for instance, feels that stores that are engaging in this type of behavior are being &#8220;irresponsible&#8221;&#8211;certainly indicative of the fact that, at least in the corporate world, &#8220;irresponsible&#8221; is all in the eye of the beholder.</p>
<p>Is the marketing ploy creative or just plain desperate?  And, is any marketing campaign ever really &#8220;responsible&#8221; if it aims to convince consumers of something that, in theory, they wouldn&#8217;t do without seeing the ad? It&#8217;s hard to say, but one thing is for sure: Anyone who spends $600 at Domino&#8217;s has even bigger health problems than our economy &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.prnewsonline.com/prnewsblog/index.php/2008/05/13/feeding-an-ailing-economy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dell&#8217;s Perpetual Purgatory?</title>
		<link>http://www.prnewsonline.com/prnewsblog/index.php/2008/05/05/dells-perpetual-purgatory/</link>
		<comments>http://www.prnewsonline.com/prnewsblog/index.php/2008/05/05/dells-perpetual-purgatory/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 18:16:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cbarnes</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[crisis communications]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Dell]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Flickr]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prnewsonline.com/prnewsblog/index.php/2008/05/05/dells-perpetual-purgatory/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dell has been to Hell and back in recent years for its monumental crisis management missteps, especially in the realm of digital communications. Blogger Jeff Jarvis single-handedly damned the company for its poor customer service record a few years back and, despite moderately successful attempts to rebound its reputation by finally participating in the blogosphere, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dell has been to Hell and back in recent years for its monumental crisis management missteps, especially in the realm of digital communications. Blogger <a href="i am so impressed with your ability to communicate with the free world from behind the iron curtain. i think i would rather be dead than in e. germany.">Jeff Jarvis</a> single-handedly damned the company for its poor customer service record a few years back and, despite moderately successful attempts to rebound its reputation by <a href="http://direct2dell.com/one2one/default.aspx">finally participating</a> in the blogosphere, consumer spite has reared its ugly head again.</p>
<p>On May 2, a U.K. customer posted a rant in a chat room informing fellow Dell users of a glaring error on select models of Vostro laptop keyboards—that is, a much-too-long shift key threw an entire row of keys out of whack, making it nearly impossible to type properly.  The real rub, though, is that the faux pas spawned <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/jacobgordon/2455618195/in/photostream/">a diatribe on Flickr</a>, complete with a picture of the faulty keyboard and frequent updates by one user.</p>
<p>This is just one more example of how crisis can spin out of control when angry consumers are at the helm.  Granted, if anyone was trying to post with one of those Dell machines, their message wouldn’t be as easy to decipher. Perhaps that was all part of the plan?</p>
<p>By Courtney Barnes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.prnewsonline.com/prnewsblog/index.php/2008/05/05/dells-perpetual-purgatory/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s Never Too Late to Get LinkedIn</title>
		<link>http://www.prnewsonline.com/prnewsblog/index.php/2008/04/28/its-never-too-late-to-get-linkedin/</link>
		<comments>http://www.prnewsonline.com/prnewsblog/index.php/2008/04/28/its-never-too-late-to-get-linkedin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 16:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cbarnes</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[LinkedIn]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[MySpace]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prnewsonline.com/prnewsblog/index.php/2008/04/28/its-never-too-late-to-get-linkedin/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After writing an article for PR News about how to use LinkedIn as an effective business tool, I realized that I was a hypocrite—I was espousing the value of a robust profile, but my own was skeletal at best.  So, I followed my own advice and rounded it out with past experience, information about my [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After writing an <a href="http://www.prnewsonline.com/news/11676.html">article</a> for <em>PR News</em> about how to use LinkedIn as an effective business tool, I realized that I was a hypocrite—I was espousing the value of a robust profile, but my own was skeletal at best.  So, I followed my own advice and rounded it out with past experience, information about my education, a customized URL and background information about my general interest and areas of expertise.</p>
<p>In the interest of full disclosure, my involvement with the social network&#8211;and social networks in general&#8211;was basically flat-lined; in terms of my LinkedIn profile, I would accept invitations when they were extended, but I did nothing to proactively reconnect with the business contacts that I’ve accumulated over the years.  As for a <a href="http://www.facebook.com">Facebook</a> account, much to my friends&#8217; disbelief, I do not have a profile; my <a href="http://www.myspace.com">MySpace</a> presence is solely relegated to <em>PR News</em>&#8216; <a href="http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&amp;friendid=245163099">page</a>.</p>
<p>So, starting now (at least as far as LinkedIn is concerned), I plan to make a concerted effort to reach out to others, and to actively in engage in the community.  After all, <a href="http://www.roberthalffinance.com/portal/site/rhf-us/menuitem.b55c61eb41144dbf9a64e9c302f3dfa0/?vgnextoid=51bb7d3a6189a010VgnVCM100000213ffd0aRCRD&amp;javax.portlet.prp_7658df44c982f2e6fa64e9c302f3dfa0_releaseId=2222&amp;javax.portlet.prp_7658df44c982f2e6fa64e9c302f3dfa0_request_type=RenderPressRelease">study</a> after study shows that it’s a viable business communications platform, and communicating is precisely the business that I’m in.  So, with that, <a href="http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&amp;key=7375416&amp;fromSearch=0&amp;sik=1209169513128&amp;split_page=1&amp;rd=in&amp;authToken=2ZjutA8dp_PBJwwWWFZUimi4digkljnQldgkURcQ4Scj4NejB4dPgScjgRdPcT&amp;authType=NAME_SEARCH&amp;goback=%2Esrp_1_1209169513128_in">here</a> is my profile.  I’d love to link in with anyone who’s out there listening …</p>
<p>By Courtney Barnes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.prnewsonline.com/prnewsblog/index.php/2008/04/28/its-never-too-late-to-get-linkedin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t Try This at Home &#8212; aka Are You Really Dumb Enough to Try This at Home?</title>
		<link>http://www.prnewsonline.com/prnewsblog/index.php/2008/04/22/dont-try-this-at-home-aka-are-you-really-dumb-enough-to-try-this-at-home/</link>
		<comments>http://www.prnewsonline.com/prnewsblog/index.php/2008/04/22/dont-try-this-at-home-aka-are-you-really-dumb-enough-to-try-this-at-home/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 17:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cbarnes</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Blendtec]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Kobe Bryant]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Nike]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prnewsonline.com/prnewsblog/index.php/2008/04/22/dont-try-this-at-home-aka-are-you-really-dumb-enough-to-try-this-at-home/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Viral marketing and word of mouth is all the buzz these days, especially with platforms like YouTube enabling levels of fame and exposure never before thought possible. And, if the video sharing site could make a skateboarding dog famous, imagine what it can do for companies with money to pour into creative content and production.
That&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Viral marketing and word of mouth is all the buzz these days, especially with platforms like YouTube enabling levels of fame and exposure never before thought possible. And, if the video sharing site could make a <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CQzUsTFqtW0">skateboarding dog </a>famous, imagine what it can do for companies with money to pour into creative content and production.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s basically what Nike did in making <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SNOwISiqj3g">this</a> YouTube video of NBA superstar Kobe Bryant leaping over a moving sports car to market its latest and greates, lighter-than-air basketball shoe. With approximately 2.5 million views to-date, it&#8217;s safe to dub this effort a viral marketing success&#8211;but not so fast.  Despite its obvious dramatization, there has been an outcry among critics, many of whom believe that the video threatens the safety of gullible viewers who try to recreate the gravity-defying stunt in their own driveways. Of course, the &#8220;do not try this at home&#8221; disclaimers in the video do nothing to mitigate their harsh judgment, and Nike execs must now field questions and address complaints.</p>
<p>The situation raises a few questions. First, is all PR good PR? The video has been widely viewed, making it a success by those simple measures.  But will the fallout outweigh the benefits?</p>
<p>Personally, I find it ridiculous that people hold a video like this one responsible for the actions taken by uninformed (read: unintelligent) consumers.  Yes, I understand that children are most susceptible to incurring injuries from trying to soar like Kobe, but saying that Nike is to blame would be like holding Blendtec (of <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qg1ckCkm8YI">&#8220;Will It Blend?&#8221;</a> fame) accountable if some kid tested the theory on the family dog.</p>
<p>The other, more PR-oriented question is that of authenticity: Should Nike have been more clear that this was a &#8220;Hollywood-ified&#8221; video fueled not by superhuman powers, but by special effects? Anyone with deductive reasoning skills would reach that conclusion (besides the limitations imposed by gravity, athletes with multi-million dollar contracts aren&#8217;t usually allowed to throw themselves willingly in front of moving vehicles), but maybe a &#8220;this is a dramatization&#8221; would have been a good opener.  When book-ended with that disclaimer and the &#8220;do not try this at home&#8221; warning, the video covers all its bases.  If anyone manages to still find reason to believe they can emulate the stunt, then perhaps it&#8217;s best to defer to Charles Darwin.  When it comes to survival of the fittest, only the strong will survive.</p>
<p>By Courtney Barnes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.prnewsonline.com/prnewsblog/index.php/2008/04/22/dont-try-this-at-home-aka-are-you-really-dumb-enough-to-try-this-at-home/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Starbucks Made Me Feel Fat</title>
		<link>http://www.prnewsonline.com/prnewsblog/index.php/2008/04/14/starbucks-made-me-feel-fat/</link>
		<comments>http://www.prnewsonline.com/prnewsblog/index.php/2008/04/14/starbucks-made-me-feel-fat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 20:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cbarnes</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[calories]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[starbucks]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[transparency]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prnewsonline.com/prnewsblog/index.php/2008/04/14/starbucks-made-me-feel-fat/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As previously mentioned, I am a Starbucks junkie.  A few moments ago, I returned from my afternoon iced-coffee run at my regular outpost, where I was completely devastated to learn that the lemon pound cake I frequently purchase has 500 calories.  Five. Hundred. Calories.
Obviously, I know that Starbucks&#8217; fresh baked goods are neither fresh nor [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As <a href="http://www.prnewsonline.com/prnewsblog/index.php/2008/02/28/dunkin-donuts-out-does-starbucks-again/">previously mentioned</a>, I am a Starbucks junkie.  A few moments ago, I returned from my afternoon iced-coffee run at my regular outpost, where I was completely devastated to learn that the lemon pound cake I frequently purchase has 500 calories.  Five. Hundred. Calories.</p>
<p>Obviously, I know that Starbucks&#8217; fresh baked goods are neither fresh nor good for you, but today (as far as I could tell) was the first time they put the calorie content on the labels of every treat in their display case.  Just as I prefer to not know how much money I spend at Starbucks each week, I would like to remain ignorant to how many calories I consumer there as well.</p>
<p>However, even though the woman in line behind me agreed that it was a painful truth to stomach, it’s clearly another move the coffee chain is making to resurrect its wounded reputation.  Another notable change is the limited-time-only brown logo, which celebrates the brand’s beginnings in Seattle and its new Pike Place brew (a smoother blend that aims to rebuff claims that Starbucks beans taste over-roasted and burned).</p>
<p>Was the logo change a good idea? I’m going to go with “yes,” as the brown mermaid made a previous appearance to celebrate Starbucks’ 35th anniversary in 2006; with Chairman Howard Schultz back at the helm, it seems like a natural way to illustrate the brand’s forward momentum while celebrating its historic rise to international ubiquity.</p>
<p>As for the complete transparency (which is, of course, always a good PR strategy) with front-and-center nutrition facts, I think I will remain a believer that ignorance is in fact bliss.</p>
<p>By Courtney Barnes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.prnewsonline.com/prnewsblog/index.php/2008/04/14/starbucks-made-me-feel-fat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>(Not) Leavin&#8217; on a Jet Plane</title>
		<link>http://www.prnewsonline.com/prnewsblog/index.php/2008/04/11/not-leavin-on-a-jet-plane/</link>
		<comments>http://www.prnewsonline.com/prnewsblog/index.php/2008/04/11/not-leavin-on-a-jet-plane/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 19:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cbarnes</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[American Airlines]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[British Airways]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[crisis]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[reputation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prnewsonline.com/prnewsblog/index.php/2008/04/11/not-leavin-on-a-jet-plane/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, as recent blog posts have indicated, I’ve traveled A LOT in the past two weeks, which put me directly in the midst of the current airline image crisis.  I managed to escape the blips, but just barely—I landed in London on British Airways exactly one day before the Terminal 5 screw-up, and I flew [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, as recent blog posts have indicated, I’ve traveled A LOT in the past two weeks, which put me directly in the midst of the current airline image crisis.  I managed to escape the blips, but just barely—I landed in London on British Airways exactly one day before the <a href="http://www.britishairways.com/travel/t5message/public/en_gb">Terminal 5 screw-up</a>, and I flew on American Airlines the morning its planes began lining up for safety checks… only to stay <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=89551853&amp;ft=1&amp;f=1001">grounded</a> due to wiring problems.</p>
<p>Despite my good fortune in the skies, these recent crises have further tarnished the image of an industry that was already experiencing serious turbulence.  The PR teams for British Airways and American Airlines (which are partner airlines, to boot—ouch) are taking heat for mismanaging communications about the “inconveniences,” but there are a few bright spots as well: American announced it was hiring an outside company to review its process for complying with government inspections, which lends credibility to the airline’s commitment to safety. And, of course, grounding flights, despite the annoyance of delays and cancellations, is far better than putting a faulty piece of metal into the air (although I am the first to admit that these safety red flags mean I’ll be packing Xanax in my carry-on from now on).</p>
<p>Then, yesterday, American’s CEO Gerard Arpey said he is taking “personal responsibility” for the maintenance errors that prompted the disruptions for travelers. &#8220;I run the company,&#8221; he said at a news conference, &#8220;so if there&#8217;s any blame to be had, it is my fault, and I take full responsibility for this.&#8221;</p>
<p>Good for him.</p>
<p>Of course, these inspection snafus point to a bigger issue—one that concerns the Federal Aviation Administration’s oversight of its safety regulations.  While this story will continue to unfold in the coming days, the skies aren’t looking so friendly for the PR execs who must now manage the crippled reputations—and airplanes—at the center of this debacle.</p>
<p>By Courtney Barnes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.prnewsonline.com/prnewsblog/index.php/2008/04/11/not-leavin-on-a-jet-plane/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PR Pros Better Off Than Marketers</title>
		<link>http://www.prnewsonline.com/prnewsblog/index.php/2008/04/08/pr-pros-better-off-than-marketers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.prnewsonline.com/prnewsblog/index.php/2008/04/08/pr-pros-better-off-than-marketers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 20:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cbarnes</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[IBM]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Mike Moran]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prnewsonline.com/prnewsblog/index.php/2008/04/08/pr-pros-better-off-than-marketers/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mike Moran, product manager at IBM, is in the midst of his keynote, and he just made a comment that should make PR professionals everywhere smile:
&#8220;This [digital communications] is a sea change for marketers. The Internet is the place where everyone at every moment is deciding what they want to be interested in.  You [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike Moran, product manager at IBM, is in the midst of his keynote, and he just made a comment that should make PR professionals everywhere smile:</p>
<p>&#8220;This [digital communications] is a sea change for marketers. The Internet is the place where everyone at every moment is deciding what they want to be interested in.  <em>You</em> are the storytelling experts, not marketers—that’s what <em>you</em> know how to do.  Your job at this point is to start using that skill in more places.</p>
<p>Instead of looking at the Internet as a threat, look at it as something that makes everything you know more valuable than it was before—bigger and more important.  You know how to get past gatekeepers because you’ve always had them. What you need to think about is who these new gatekeepers are on the Web.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not the marketing people that are the hot shots at viral messaging.  It&#8217;s you.&#8221;</p>
<p>By Courtney Barnes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.prnewsonline.com/prnewsblog/index.php/2008/04/08/pr-pros-better-off-than-marketers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Go Forth and Optimize</title>
		<link>http://www.prnewsonline.com/prnewsblog/index.php/2008/04/08/go-forth-and-optimize/</link>
		<comments>http://www.prnewsonline.com/prnewsblog/index.php/2008/04/08/go-forth-and-optimize/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 20:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cbarnes</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Search engine optimization]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prnewsonline.com/prnewsblog/index.php/2008/04/08/go-forth-and-optimize/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m just now finishing lunch and listening to Mike Moran of IBM give a keynote speech, but I think the more interesting conversation actually took place directly next to me a moment ago. I was talking to Amy Dean, president of Dean Public Relations, about what&#8217;s going on in public relations due to the digitization [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m just now finishing lunch and listening to Mike Moran of IBM give a keynote speech, but I think the more interesting conversation actually took place directly next to me a moment ago. I was talking to Amy Dean, president of Dean Public Relations, about what&#8217;s going on in public relations due to the digitization of &#8230; well, everything, and she boiled it all down very quickly:</p>
<p>&#8220;Think of [the Internet] as a sea where everyone is sending up smoke signals to find each other. Search engine optimization is that smoke signal.  It&#8217;s not the great equalizer&#8211;it&#8217;s the great integrator.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s right&#8211;every session and every conversation during the last two days of the Bulldog conference has been about blogs and social media and so on, but&#8211;and I hadn&#8217;t really thought about it before&#8211;the one thing that ties all of these channels together is SEO, so <em>that&#8217;s</em> what PR people need to be learning. Sure, you need something to optimize in the first place but, unless you get that content in front of your target audience, your messages will die a lonely death on the 37th page of Google&#8217;s search results &#8230;<br />
By Courtney Barnes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.prnewsonline.com/prnewsblog/index.php/2008/04/08/go-forth-and-optimize/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Future of Communications</title>
		<link>http://www.prnewsonline.com/prnewsblog/index.php/2008/04/07/the-future-of-communications/</link>
		<comments>http://www.prnewsonline.com/prnewsblog/index.php/2008/04/07/the-future-of-communications/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 20:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cbarnes</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Disney Parks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prnewsonline.com/prnewsblog/index.php/2008/04/07/the-future-of-communications/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just a quick note based on a keynote speech by Duncan Wardle, VP, Global PR, Disney Parks:
&#8220;We all have employees.  Some [companies] have tens of thousands of them&#8211;but we don&#8217;t use them. The future of communications will be letting all employees blog.&#8221;
By Courtney Barnes
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a quick note based on a keynote speech by Duncan Wardle, VP, Global PR, Disney Parks:</p>
<p>&#8220;We all have employees.  Some [companies] have tens of thousands of them&#8211;but we don&#8217;t use them. The future of communications will be letting all employees blog.&#8221;</p>
<p>By Courtney Barnes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.prnewsonline.com/prnewsblog/index.php/2008/04/07/the-future-of-communications/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Charlie Rose on PR Ethics: It Is an Issue</title>
		<link>http://www.prnewsonline.com/prnewsblog/index.php/2008/04/07/charlie-rose-on-pr-ethics-it-is-an-issue/</link>
		<comments>http://www.prnewsonline.com/prnewsblog/index.php/2008/04/07/charlie-rose-on-pr-ethics-it-is-an-issue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 16:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cbarnes</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Bulldog Reporter]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Charlie Rose]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Howard Rubenstein]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[PR ethics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prnewsonline.com/prnewsblog/index.php/2008/04/07/charlie-rose-on-pr-ethics-it-is-an-issue/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The session with Charlie Rose and Howard Rubenstein is ending, and (in my opinion), this was a highlight from a PR perspective: Rubenstein asked Rose what he thought of the state of ethics in PR, and Rose responded bluntly that &#8220;It is an issue.&#8221;
&#8220;We are your advocates here,&#8221; he continued, referring to the media. &#8220;We [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The session with Charlie Rose and Howard Rubenstein is ending, and (in my opinion), this was a highlight from a PR perspective: Rubenstein asked Rose what he thought of the state of ethics in PR, and Rose responded bluntly that &#8220;It is an issue.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;We are your advocates here,&#8221; he continued, referring to the media. &#8220;We have an interest and a goal—we have an agenda, and it may or not be yours—but at the same time, keep people like me informed so that I feel like you have my interest in mind.&#8221;</p>
<p>Rubenstein followed that comment by saying that too many PR people blindly send pitches, and Rose then offered two very valuable tips to the communicators in the audience:</p>
<p>&#8220;Don&#8217;t insult our intelligence.&#8221; (This comment was met with good-natured laughter.)</p>
<p>And&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;Don&#8217;t send us [journalists] things that we know are official lies. If I think you are trying to spin me and you think I&#8217;m trying to screw you, then we are at a loss.&#8221;</p>
<p>Touche.</p>
<p>By Courtney Barnes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.prnewsonline.com/prnewsblog/index.php/2008/04/07/charlie-rose-on-pr-ethics-it-is-an-issue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
