Oh My! Goldman Sachs Uses ‘Public Relations Officers’ to Help Manage the Crisis

Posted on April 19, 2010 
Filed Under General

Public Relations has come a long way, but once again it’s been shorted by those who don’t understand the value of this discipline. Hardly a day goes by that I don’t read or hear about a situation (global or local)  that is just a “PR ploy” or “PR maneuver.”  It’s as if “public relations” is a naughty 2-word phrase that hides the ugly truth about something.

The recent news about the SEC charges of fraud against Goldman Sachs has led to some public posturing from the investment firm and accusations from analysts and commentators that the company is rolling out a PR strategy to defend against the charges. Don’t you shudder at the thought of a company in crisis using PR tactics? How crazy is that? Of course, it’s referred to in a negative light – as if PR is the tactic deployed from the playbook of lies and deceit. I am not going to comment on the unfolding Goldman Sachs investigation, but it is interesting to watch it unfold in the media.

On CNBC’s Street Signs show on Sunday, a principal at R&R Consulting – Sylvain Raynes – accused host Jim Cramer of only having “public relations officers for Goldman” on his show.  Insinuating that Cramer and others on the show were associated with Goldman Sachs and therefore biased in favor of the firm, host Erin Burnett warned Raynes to stop insulting the hosts, took a commercial break and told the viewing audience (assured them?) that Raynes would not be back after the break.  The episode is a case study in poor hosting and the dearth of media training by spokespeople and purported experts.

Raynes,  a mathemetician who holds a PhD in aeronautical engineering, could use a few pointers on how to get his message across without insulting the messengers. And host Erin Burnett and Jim Cramer, by taking his barbs personally, set back the notion that the media is objective and open to all lines of thought.

But back to the criticism that Goldman is fielding its “public relations officers” during this latest crisis.  What they’re doing is not a bad thing.  It’s Crisis Management 101.  Regardless of how the investigation pans out, the role of the Public Relations Officer doesn’t change – to manage the organization’s reputation and communicate the right messages at the right time.

Diane Schwartz

Comments

  • http://www.davidrosenassociates.com David Rosen

    It was a bizarre encounter in which no one looked good, especially Cramer and Burnett. They should be able to take the heat. Raynes needs polish and finesse to be sure but what do you expect from a math and technical finance guy. The real blame for the fiasco lies with whoever booked Raynes without finding out what he might say.Who does he represent? What was he doing there?

  • http://www.criticalmention.com/web/index.php Steve Shannon

    Good points all around on Raynes, Burnett and Cramer. I think however, that PR will be perpetually tilting at a windmill in trying to change the perception that “public relations” is a naughty 2-word phrase that hides the ugly truth about something.” After nearly a quarter century of making my living through B2B sales, I can tell you with certainty that sales professionals are in the same perception boat with PR. Always thus and ever will be.

  • http://www.merchantcircle.com Kevindra

    In fact there is no real other public tool that can be used in such situations, there lawyers are not going to win them very many friends and the public needs to have a unclustered view, they’re in a very deep pit with those issues and they will be severely burned, so to help to heal those burns they need us.

  • http://fragmentspet.hypnosistochangeyourlifereview.info/clarke_trumpet_voluntary_sheet_music.aspx Barbara Esten

    Howdy, lovely web site and yet slightly slow the instant I access it, it will be in all probability my web connectivity, I’m not certain. With thanks

Copyright © 2014 Access Intelligence, LLC. All rights reserved • All Rights Reserved.