One of the truths we’ve learned from analyzing miles and miles of column inches and billions of bytes of online news is that the bigger the event, the more the likelihood of negative coverage. It’s the Publicist’s Paradox: The more effective you are at generating attention for your company, event or happening, the more inevitable the negative coverage. So it was hardly surprising that the Facebook initial public offering would generate its fair share of skeptics and naysayers even before it actually went public. Yet the May 18, 2012, IPO was supposed to be a glorious day for all stakeholders involved, making employees wealthy and bringing a much-needed boost to Wall Street. But what no one planned for was first that the underwriters would lower their financial forecasts and only tell insiders—not the general public—and that due to a tech overload, millions of dollars in trades either couldn’t be placed or couldn’t be canceled.
Facebook vs. Nasdaq: One Party Plays Blame Game, Earning an F
You might also be interested in:
- 6 Tips to Help Build Execs' Credibility Through Bylined Articles
- Retailers' Social Actions on Instagram Up 48% Compared to Last Year
- Analytics, SEO, Virtual Teams, Video Surged in 2015, Will Continue in 2016
- A 6-Step Pre-Holidays PR Checkup to Bring the Year to a Successful Close
- 7 Tech Trends Chief Communications Officers Should Track in 2016