Asia-Pacific Watch: Drivers Of Perception

What are the characteristics of a "good and responsible" company that wants to do business in Asia-Pacific markets? Increasingly, they're non-tangible factors, like doing
something for the community and making products that impress other people, says the second annual Edelman/Wirthlin Asia Pacific Stakeholder Research Study.

The survey, which was released last week, took the pulse of 540 people representing six different stakeholder groups in nine Asia-Pacific markets.

These respondents included C-level decision-makers, government officials, media reps, NGO/trade association executives, middle- to upper-class consumers who work in
multinational corporations and employees working in the drug, healthcare and technology/ telecommunications industries.

The study presents senior PR execs (working for global companies) with information on the tools they need to build relationships in nine Asia-Pacific markets (many of them
still emerging, see PRNews Oct. 27): Australia, China (Beijing, Guangzhou, and Shanghai), Hong Kong, India (Delhi and Mumbai), Japan (Tokyo), Korea (Seoul), Malaysia
(Kuala Lumpur), Singapore and Taiwan (Taipei). PRN

IN 2004 SOCIAL FACTORS RECEIVED A HIGHER PRIORITY AND - IN SOME AREAS - HAVE RIVALED TANGIBLE BUSINESS FACTORS
Characteristics of a Responsible Corporation in Asia Pacific
2003
2004
Offers top quality products/services
82%
78%
Stands behind its products/services when something goes wrong
76%
72%
Listens to customer attitudes and opinions on satisfaction
65%
65%
Provides senior leadership that can be trusted
55%
56%
Works hard at building relationships with core audiences
--
52%
Operates in an open and transparent fashion
50%
51%
Provides good training and development for staff
54%
49%
Provides profits for its owners and / or shareholders
58%
49%
Makes products that really impress other people
58%
44%
Communicates frequently and openly with employees
41%
42%
Educates customers about the impact of its products and services on society
36%
37%
Concerned about/active in doing something about community welfare
29%
36%
  • Significantly, more respondents ranked "concerned about/active in doing something about community welfare" (36%) as essential in 2004 compared with 2003 (29%).
  • Significantly less respondents ranked "provides profits for owners/shareholders" (49%)as essential in 2004 compared with 2003 (58%).
  • Significantly less respondents ranked "makes products that really impress other people" (44%) as essential in 2004 compared with 2003( 58%).